Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (151 Views)
Background & objectives:The emergence of COVID-19 has precipitated a global health crisis, profoundly affecting various dimensions of human life, including social, academic, cultural, economic, and political spheres. This study aims to compare the management strategies employed by South Korea, Japan, and Iran in response to the pandemic, highlighting the effectiveness of their approaches and the resultant outcomes. Methods:This research employs a comprehensive literature review of articles from scientific databases, including Scopus, Elsevier, Science Direct, PubMed, and ISI. It analyzes the strategies each country implemented to curb the spread of COVID-19, highlighting both successes and challenges encountered during the pandemic. Results: The findings indicate that countries with prior experience in managing epidemics, such as South Korea and Japan, were better equipped to handle the COVID-19 crisis. South Korea’s rapid response included widespread testing, contact tracing, and the use of technology to monitor the virus's spread. Japan, leveraging its geographical proximity to China and existing health infrastructure, also implemented effective measures, including travel restrictions and public health campaigns. In contrast, Iran faced significant challenges in managing the pandemic. The rapid spread of COVID-19 overwhelmed its healthcare system, exacerbated by pre-existing economic sanctions and health infrastructure deficiencies. Despite various strategies implemented by the Iranian government and the Ministry of Health, including public awareness campaigns and temporary lockdowns, the outcomes were less favorable compared to South Korea and Japan. Inadequate responses to the health crisis resulted in serious social and psychological consequences, worsening the situation. Conclusion: Countries that effectively managed the new coronavirus pandemic had prior experience with epidemics. Their swift actions and recognition of the critical situation contributed to minimizing human and financial losses.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject: General Received: 2024/09/18 | Accepted: 2024/07/31 | Published: 2024/07/31
References
1. Marinoni G, Land H. The impact of the coronavirus on global higher education, international higher Education. 2020:7-9.
2. Pooladi M, Entezari M, Hashemi M, Bahonar A, Hushmandi K, Raei M. Investigating the Efficient Management of Different Countries in the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Mar Med 2020; 2(1):18-25.
3. Reis RF, de Melo Quintela B, de Oliveira Campos J, Gomes JM, Rocha BM, Lobosco M, et al. Characterization of the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact of uncertainties, mitigation strategies, and underreporting of cases in South Korea, Italy, and Brazil. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 2020;136:109888. [DOI:10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109888]
4. Jin Y, Yang H, Ji W, Wu W, Chen S, Zhang W, et al. Virology, Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Control of COVID-19. Viruses 2020;12:372. [DOI:10.3390/v12040372]
5. Kwok KO, Chan HHH, Huang Y, Hui DSC, Tambyah PA, Wei WI, et al. Inferring super-spreading from transmission clusters of COVID-19 in Hong Kong, Japan, and Singapore. Journal of Hospital Infection 2020;105:682-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2020.05.027]
6. Fontanella MM, Saraceno G, Lei T, Bederson JB, You N, Rubiano AM, et al. Neurosurgical activity during COVID-19 pandemic: an experts' opinion from China, South Korea, Italy, the USA, Colombia, and the UK. Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2020;64. [DOI:10.23736/S0390-5616.20.04994-2]
7. Mollalo A, Vahedi B, Rivera KM. GIS-based spatial modeling of COVID-19 incidence rate in the continental United States. Science of The Total Environment 2020;728:138884. [DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138884]
8. Abdi M. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)outbreak in Iran: Actions and problems. Infect Control Hospital Epidemiol 2020; 41: 754-755. [DOI:10.1017/ice.2020.86]
9. Rafieepour A, Masoumi G, Dehghani A. Health Responses during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An International Strategy and Experience Analysis. Health in Emergencies & Disasters Quarterly 2021;6:147-60. [DOI:10.32598/hdq.6.3.310.1]
10. Chu DK, Akl EA, Duda S, Solo K, Yaacoub S, Schünemann HJ, et al. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review andmeta-analysis.TheLancet. 2020;395:1973-87. [DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2020.07.040]
11. Grasselli G, Pesenti A, Cecconi M. Critical Care Utilization for the COVID-19 Outbreak in Lombardy, Italy. JAMA. 2020;323:1545. [DOI:10.1001/jama.2020.4031]
12. Nakajima K, Kato H, Yamashiro T, Izumi T, Takeuchi I, Nakajima H, et al. COVID-19 pneumonia: infection control protocol inside computed tomography suites. Japanese Journal of Radiology. 2020;38:391-3. [DOI:10.1007/s11604-020-00948-y]
13. Samadi S, Herati A, Khalilabad T. The challenge of human resources in units providing health care services during the covid-19 epidemic: identification, solutions, and consequences. Health and Treatment Quarterly. 2023; 14(1(47)): 57-66.
14. Rajkumar RP. COVID-19 and mental health: A review of the existing literature. Asian Journal of Psychiatry 2020;10:102066. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102066]
15. Nicola M, O'Neill N, Sohrabi C, Khan M, Agha M, Agha R. Evidence based management guideline for the COVID-19 pandemic - Review article. International Journal of Surgery 2020;77:206-16. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.001]
16. Amiri MM, Shams L, Nasiri T. Identifying andCategorizing the Dimensions of Iran's Health SystemResponse to the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Military Medicine 2020; 22: 108-114.
17. Foley DA, Kirk M, Jepp C, Brophy‐Williams S, Tong SYC, Davis JS, et al. COVID‐19 and paediatric health services: A survey of paediatric physicians in Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 2020;56:1219-24. [DOI:10.1111/jpc.14903]